Search for: "People v. Story" Results 4121 - 4140 of 9,952
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am by Florian Mueller
There's also this story from credible sources that he refused to undergo surgery for a long time after his cancer had been diagnosed because in his New Age thinking surgery would harm, not heal, his body. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:55 pm by Florian Mueller
Some people in Cupertino should listen to the official recording (MP3) of yesterday's Federal Circuit hearing on the cross-appeal relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:17 am
And while most judicial opinions will not — and need not — consciously engage with these multiple constitutional audiences, this framework illuminates why certain opinions such as Brown v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rosa & Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit just handed down an interesting and important right-of-publicity decision, in Rosa & Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
So what of the two stories which have prompted this article? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
LTD. v. uCOOL, INC. https://t.co/DyoGX8FYr2 -> Use of photo in blog post is fair use says US CA Katz v. [read post]