Search for: "People v. White" Results 4121 - 4140 of 7,175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  There’s mere wordplay to say that photos are transformed from documentation of wedding to confirmation of text saying people are married.Then there’s White v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:31 am by Jani
Hotham, in his journalistic endeavors, contacted an organization called Straight Pride UK, one which advocates their notion of current discrimination of heterosexual people in the light of emerging gay rights. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:15 am by Sophia Cope
Thankfully Santana was not harassed for wielding his cell phone, but many people have been: officers have ordered people to stop recording, seized their devices, deleted the photos or video/audio recordings, and even arrested people. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am by Stephen Bilkis
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:01 pm by sgottlieb
The world that so many of us, Black and white for different reasons, have learned to fear, is a post-Terry v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:58 am by David Gans
  White Unionists in the South faced pervasive discrimination because they had fought and helped win the Civil War. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:32 am by Kent Scheidegger
  (See Jonathan Haidt for a more complete explanation of conservative v. libertarian mindsets.)The Seattle Post-Intelligencer has a feature on Paul's stands on issues. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:47 pm by Jeremy
This got short shrift from the judge who quoted the Hoffman v Dare judgment. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:45 am by Nassiri Law
That gap is even wider for Latina women, who earn 44 cents to every dollar white men make. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
See also United States v Mojica, 62 AD3d 100, 110 (2d Dept) ("the defendant may not assert a due process challenge contending that the statute is vague as applied to the conduct of others (see Broadrick v Oklahoma, 413 US 601, 608 [1973]; People v Shack, 86 NY2d 529, 538 [1995]; People v Nelson, 69 NY2d 302, 308 [1987]. [read post]