Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples" Results 4121 - 4140 of 73,137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am by Frank Cranmer
: on two significant decisions on the legal recognition of same-sex couples: Buhuceanu and Others v Romania and Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
An approach more aware of regular people’s concerns must therefore come from the agencies and their work in the courts. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:42 pm by Tom Smith
A little censorship leads people to watch what they say. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:15 am by Ilya Somin
Barbas' "Actual Malice" tells the full story of New York Times v. [read post]