Search for: "STATE v. COLORADO"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 4,922
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2008, 11:24 pm
Different states have different practices, but in Texas (and 10 other states) DNA swabs are taken upon arrest and entered into the system. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:40 am
In late 2023, the FBI announced it was investigating a series of violent threats made against the Colorado Supreme Court after the court ruled that Trump should be disqualified from the state’s 2024 presidential ballot. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 8:20 am
Part V offers some starting points for future discussion. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court held in Gobeille v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:46 pm
From People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
, Colorado Technology Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2020, Emmanuel Pernot-Leplay, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) – KoGuan Law School. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977). [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:59 pm
Thirty deaths were reported: Colorado (8), Indiana (1), Kansas (3), Louisiana (2), Maryland (1), Missouri (3), Nebraska (1), New Mexico (5), New York (2), Oklahoma (1), Texas (2), and Wyoming (1). [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:37 pm
Burwell v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 8:28 am
Let’s look at the recent Colorado case of Doe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, addressed states’ authority to regulate LGBT issues; his opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:18 am
In Arriaga v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm
” In 2013, Kennedy would provide the key vote and write for the court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 8:29 am
An Overview of GeorogiaCarry.org v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm
The question before the Court in Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:34 am
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
That article is cited in the Justice Gorsuch's dissent in Oklahoma v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
