Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 7,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2023, 12:07 pm
In 2021, current SEC Chair Gary Gensler asserted that the SEC considers crypto as a security under the “Howey Test,” derived from the Supreme Court case, SEC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
It was this nationalistic Hamiltonian mode that found its way into the United States Reports through Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion for the Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
The Brandenburg v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
Tobacco manufacturers and the United States government: ready for battle. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
West Virginia: Court Sustains Jury’s Valuation Award Excluding Marketability and Minority Discounts Under Stock Redemption Agreement’s Fair Market Value Standard Tri-State Petroleum Corp. v Coyne, 814 S.E.2d 205 [Sup. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:31 am
Todd v. [read post]
Golden Anniversary: The Supreme Court’s Engel Decision Protected Religious Liberty In Public Schools
22 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
Supreme Court handed down a crucial church-state ruling in Engel v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 6:47 pm
” He explained: “With this ongoing court battle, there is a great deal of uncertainty for states, individuals, and businesses as to whether this law will be around two years from now or not. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 3:07 pm
Rather, they condemn us to a never-ending battle for power among equally true (or equally false) secular and religious convictions. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:04 pm
Read the whole opinion, Zabaneh Franchises v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
In the supreme court case, The State of Ohio v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:50 pm
., United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:12 am
lawsuit: Dunbar v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:55 pm
In a decision handed down this week, R. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:55 am
The case is Dillon v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 4:33 am
” For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Scott Calvert report that “[t]he Supreme Court is facing a sensitive choice on whether to intervene in a partisan battle over Pennsylvania’s congressional map,” noting that “[t]he state court based its ruling on the Pennsylvania Constitution, a move that would normally leave the U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:20 am
In Foster v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
"AFBF President Bob Stallman states in the release, "Allowing the lower court ruling to stand would pose serious challenges to farmers battling pests . . .any length of time waiting for permit approval for products that are already approved would be disastrous [in the case of a pest outbreak]. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:16 am
In ABC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 2002 (Atkins v. [read post]
