Search for: "State v. Downes"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 36,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
Tallman's dissent would clearly give a blank check to state courts under AEDPA unless there was an exact, down to the very phrase, Supreme Court case on point.This is an important decision as to ambiguity and on invocation.U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 1:10 pm
[As stated by State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:35 pm
The majority opinion in the state court, issued unsigned but in the name of the court (“per curiam”), sought to refute every argument made for same-sex marriage as a constitutional matter and lambasted the Supreme Court for making a “moral judgment, not a legal judgment” when it struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:29 am
In Luri v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
v=1226 http://a.img-dpreview.com/Articles/Files/1999431312/image7.jpg? [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 2:10 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm
The Louisiana admitting privileges requirement struck down in June Medical was basically a carbon copy of the requirement imposed by Texas and struck down in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 8:45 am
Strict Scrutiny Compelling State Interest The court says that Utah hasn’t shown a compelling state interest. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 7:41 am
State Baldwin v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:55 am
Yesterday the Utah Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
State and State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 12:26 pm
Other rationales for striking down the law will inevitably feel a little hollow in comparison. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:09 am
The problem for plaintiff in Castagna v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:04 am
Long term, things probably will settle down. [read post]
26 Apr 2025, 3:31 pm
If a state conforms to a current federal floor and that floor is lowered then the states will be forced to go down for the ride. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
Justice Sotomayor asserted that “Section 5 was created . . . because states were moving faster than” litigation could catch up with new kinds of discrimination; “[a]s the courts struck down one form, the states would find another. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
[1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich… [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:34 am
Driscoll v. [read post]
