Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 8:05 am
The Supreme Court is the highest court of our state. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 2:17 pm
Water Splash, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:40 am
Petition for a Writ of CertiorariAppendix to PetitionBrief of Private RespondentsBrief of State RespondentsReply Brief 11-400Florida, et al., v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm
Por: Víctor Manuel Guízar López The times have been left behind when culture and business travelled on different paths. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 3:36 pm
The good professor addresses the December 2018 Court of Chancery decision in Sciabacucchi v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:56 am
Khan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:15 am
Holder is absurd. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:04 pm
This action only dealt with benefits for gay and lesbian federal workers and their families, but government agencies that carry out some 1,100 federal laws and scores of official regulations dealing with marital benefits and opportunities also are expected to begin taking steps to implement the Court’s ruling in the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
the Supreme Court in Muehler v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:46 am
The question asked in this reference actually relates to the Regulation 3295/94, the predecessor of Regulation 1383/2003: Is Article 6.2(b) of Council Regulation 3295/94 of 22 December 1994 (the old Customs Regulation) a rule of standardised Community law that must be observed by the Court of the Member State that has been applied to by the holder of that right in accordance with Article 7 of the Regulation, and does that rule mean that the court, in making its assessment, may not… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:19 pm
Holder, which gutted a key provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm
Holder v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005) and United States v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:38 pm
Whereas using a single frame from a movie as a virtual background may often qualify as ‘fair use’ under US copyright law even in a professional setting (and thus require no permission from the copyright holder), no such limitation to copyright will be available in many European legal systems, with any ‘communication to the public’ in the sense of Art 3 of the Information Society Directive 2001/29/EC potentially constituting a copyright infringement under the domestic… [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 5:05 pm
In Cash America [v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:02 pm
" Who is the holder of the privilege? [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:30 am
“Intellectual property crimes are not victimless,” Holder said in a statement. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
On May 19, the Supreme Court decided Petrella v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
” State ex rel. [read post]
