Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am
Briefly: Linda Greenhouse marks the fortieth anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:19 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 9:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
They filed suit in mid-December alleging a variety of federal and state trademark violations including infringement, dilution by blurring, dilution by tarnishment, and false designation of origin. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Mark Walsh has a first-hand look at yesterday’s argument in Flowers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
EU General Court explains how the relevant assessment is to be undertaken | High Court employs ‘intention to target’ approach to determine application of EU/UK law in online trade mark infringement case | There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:08 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
(H.K.) v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Brad Biddle, Arizona State University College of Law (with Jorge Contreras & Vigdis Bronder) Certification (and) Marks – Understanding Usage and Practices Among Standards Organizations Some mismatch in definition of “certification” marks—some organizations deliberately avoid that term. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 5:26 am
Blacklands Malt, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:04 am
Salters v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
Hard Candy Cases, LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 3:46 am
" RxD Media, LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:56 am
Window World Int’l, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:09 am
As Justice Ginsburg pointed out, NFIB marks “the first time ever” that the Court has held that a spending condition unconstitutionally coerced the states. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 11:07 am
Lozano v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:16 am
Under this standard, the court finds that plaintiff’s allegations that defendants’ malpractice resulted in its loss of licensing fees that would have been paid by MasterCard for the use of the Mark and caused plaintiff to incur legal fees are sufficient to state a claim for damages attributable to defendants’ malpractice. [read post]
