Search for: "State v. Word" Results 4121 - 4140 of 40,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am by JB
That is the justification often offered for cases like Griswold and Lawrence.Because of two early decisions, the Slaughterhouse Cases and United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:17 am by Mack Sperling
United States Forest Service, 87 F.3d 339, 343 (9th Cir. 1996) ; Cray Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the defendants established, prima facie, that they did not owe a special duty of care to the plaintiff (see Koyko v City of New York, 189 AD3d at 812; Morgan-Word v New York City Dept. of Educ., 161 AD3d at 1068; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d at 698). [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the defendants established, prima facie, that they did not owe a special duty of care to the plaintiff (see Koyko v City of New York, 189 AD3d at 812; Morgan-Word v New York City Dept. of Educ., 161 AD3d at 1068; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d at 698). [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:35 am by MBettman
The mortgage stated that the loan was insured by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
 There was nothing in the wording of the legislation which showed that the intent of the advertiser had any relevance. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 9:54 am
By Audrey MillemannThe first case the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has decided under obviousness since the United States Supreme Court’s decision on April 30, 2007 in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
Such is the current state of European trade mark law, however, that instead it has thrown up a considerable number of legal and factual issues, although the number was reduced as a result of sensible concessions made by both sides during closing submissions [in other words, this judgment could have been even longer ...]. [read post]
In other words, the new law seeks to protect California employers and allow them to be more competitive by being able to hire out of state employees and not have them be bound by non-compete agreements in California. [read post]