Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ninth Circuit (en banc): Have you read McCulloch v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:02 pm
“In support of its decision, the court invoked a 1995 Supreme Court case, Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:12 am
The idea here is that our state’s lawmakers don’t want bars to be sued just because they sell alcohol; that wouldn’t make any sense. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
Adler: I’m very proud of the line-up in this book. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:15 am
The Duty to Respond to Public Comments In Perez v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm
The California Dental Board—which, not coincidentally, is mostly made up of dentists and orthodontists—wasn't so pleased when a company began selling clear teeth aligners direct-to-consumers online. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Dodd-Frank re-writes federal banking law and creates a new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Environmental Protection Agency to clean up a petroleum spill at Smitty’s Conoco, its former gas station located on the Yakama Reservation. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Liability for patent infringement (we will confine our example to patents) depends on two things: the scope of the protection claimed and the validity of the patent: you can’t infringe an invalid patent. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:22 am
That didn't fly. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
The importance of HIPAA entities having and being able to produce in the event of a breach or OCR audit an up-to-date, comprehensively enterprise risk assessment and response plan cannot be overstated. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am
Whether obesity can be considered a disability and thus qualify the larger sized employee for protection under the Disability Discrimination Act is an issue that landed on my desk earlier this year and I agree with Usefully Employed that protection may well apply. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 12:58 pm
Next up is Lora v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:28 am
Indeed, when a Supreme Court plurality in Barnes v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
Bates v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:18 pm
Code § 17600 et seq) intended to protect consumers from unwanted charges for ongoing subscription fees, i.e. such as those used by online subscription services. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:11 pm
It also revealed other key findings, including: 36 percent of business-critical applications are housed in the cloud, yet IT isn’t aware of nearly half of them; 66 percent of respondents believe that their organizations’ use of the cloud diminishes their ability to protect sensitive or confidential information; and 72 percent of respondents don’t believe that their cloud service provider would notify them immediately if they had a data breach involving… [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
“Today’s proposal represents the first step in a broader effort to control Salmonella contamination in all poultry products, as well as a continued commitment to protecting American consumers from foodborne illness. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
“Today’s proposal represents the first step in a broader effort to control Salmonella contamination in all poultry products, as well as a continued commitment to protecting American consumers from foodborne illness. [read post]
