Search for: "The Good Business Corp."
Results 4121 - 4140
of 4,707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
– Need for business and government to understand role of IP (IPEG) Global - Trade Marks / Brands New record for international trade mark registrations in 2008 but signs of slowdown at year end and possible negative annual income (WIPO) (IP Frontline) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Coca-Cola is no longer the world’s most valuable brand (IAM) WTO session tackles details of future register of GI products (Intellectual Property Watch) Can a house mark or… [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 11:45 pm
In re Atlas Media Corp., Serial No. 76685286 (March 6, 2009) [not precedential].The specimen comprised a sheet of paper that Applicant characterized as promotional material. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Louisiana-Pacific Corp., 2009 WL 537501 (Minn. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:21 pm
NetChoice is an advocacy group made up of companies that do business online, such as Yahoo and News Corp., which owns MySpace. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:12 pm
It would be unfair to say that the Supreme Court is squarely pro-business, but a few good decisions won't let the Court off the hook. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
Harlin Schwartzman brought a petition to dissolve a mortgage banking business called First Rate Capital Corp. under BCL 1104-a in which he alleged that he is one of three 33 1/3% shareholders; that the other two shareholders withheld his share of profits and diverted business to their separate mortgage company; and that when he demanded to be bought out they denied that he was a shareholder. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 10:23 am
Could they be more business-minded--perhaps more ruthless--than Wall Street firms? [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:22 am
It's never a good sign when management insists the company is not going out of business, which is what CEO Bob Nardelli has been doing lately. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:53 pm
Independence Tube Corp. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:12 am
Where a plaintiff cannot produce direct evidence of an employer's discriminatory intent, the plaintiff may prove his case with circumstantial evidence under the burden-shifting scheme of proof established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:01 am
AT & T Corp., 243 F.3d 812, 821 (4th Cir. 2001); see generally 1 J. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Its opinion in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Epstein, Opposition No. 91169029 [Opposition to AMERICAN BOY for clothing on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and dilution of, the mark AMERICAN GIRL, registered for clothing, dolls, and other goods and assorted services].March 24, 2009 - 11 AM: Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
The winner of that verdict was the Harman Mining Corp., a competitor of Massey on those coal sales. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness: Pivonka v Axelrod (IP… [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
But the Dolan's attempt to monetize the Newsday website and somehow combine the cable television business model with the news distribution business model is doomed. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
A defendant should be punished for the conduct that harmed the plaintiff, not for being an unsavory individual or business. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:50 am
The business was one of several that emerged to facilitate the purchase of online goods and services and the transmission of money across national borders. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 8:24 pm
"To Kuhn, people should remember that whereas patents in software are antithetical to free and open source, they're the bread and butter of Microsoft's business model â€â [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:52 am
Muckraking is a public good, and rational consumers would rather benefit from having the other guy pay for it. [read post]
