Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 4121 - 4140 of 16,267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1158(a)(1), which establishes the threshold eligibility for asylum of “any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival)" (emphasis added). [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:41 am by Victoria Clark
Across court documents, the Justice Department cites United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-9560, involves a defendant who came to the U.S. from the United Arab Emirates on a student visa. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In that case, Jackson Women’s Health Organization v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by John Jascob
In June, the Supreme Court agreed with Lucia that SEC ALJs are inferior officers of the United States and, thus, must be appointed in conformance with the Appointments Clause of the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 8:23 am by John Floyd
Supreme Court sided with the Texas courts in Medellin v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:09 am by Joel R. Brandes
To that end, it had previously decided to follow and adopt the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit in Mozes v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 3:33 pm by Nicole Muller
Ramirez, a majority of the minority population in the United States is stripped of their right to vote. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 11:22 am by Mary Whisner
Law Week—October 2018 and found this:Criminal Law  Case: United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The Court has, however, reviewed the record and takes particular note of the recent orders issued by the United States Supreme Court on July 30, 2018, and November 2, 2018, as well as the extraordinary Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]