Search for: "United States v. Man"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 6,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
The '564 Patent '564 Patent - meet your nemesis Claim 1 of the '564 patent entitled "Insecticidal combination effective against fleas on mammals, particularly cats and dogs" claimed the following A composition which provides small mammals with long-lasting protection against fleas, which includes, on the one hand, [fipronil] and, on the other hand, at least one ovicidal compound (B), of insect growth regulator (IGR) type, in a fluid vehicle which is acceptable to the mammal and suitable… [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:30 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am
United States when he said that the Constitution offered no protection for falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:32 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 3:54 pm
When so many thoughtful people, including former prosecutors, disagree with United States Attorney's conduct in these cases, we need to stop. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm
Lori Drew and in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013);… [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 7:46 am
Environmental Protection Agency, Criminal Investigation Division, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge William V. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 6:33 am
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution states, “No person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm
Worse, writes James McWilliams, a history professor at Texas State University who has launched a one-man campaign against DIY animal slaughter, it desensitizes people to the suffering of other living beings. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
Prior to around the 1970s, no state law defined marriage as between a man and a woman. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 5:50 am
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion in Keith v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
In the former sense, a man’s land, or merchandize, or money is called his property. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:36 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:08 am
The appellate court's decision in the case of Courvoisier Courts, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
The appellate court's decision in the case of Courvoisier Courts, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
(Mouvement Raëlien Suisse v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
(Mouvement Raëlien Suisse v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
