Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 4121 - 4140 of 6,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 2:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court used that standard in 1938 in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Bailey DeSimone
Lingering state sodomy laws were invalidated in the 2003 Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
”[7] To strip a foreign sovereign of immunity, such suit must involve (1) property taken in violation of international law, and (2)(a) such property must be present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on by the foreign state, or (2)(b) must be possessed by an “agency or instrumentality” of the foreign state that also carries on commercial activity in the United States.[8] When claimants file… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am by Ellis Cose
He had learned that many demographers thought whites would eventually become a minority race in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:21 pm by Joe Mullin
Schreiner said the Court had “launched the United States Patent System into the Information Age with the Bilski v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
United Federation of Teachers et al., amici curiae. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am by Adam Feldman
” The cases This hypothesis is easily testable at the Supreme Court level because all of the relevant data are available, mainly from the United States Supreme Court Database. [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:50 pm by David Bernstein
" MICHAEL OMI & HOWARD WINANT, RACIAL FORMATION IN THE UNITED STATES 122 (3d ed. 2015); see also PETER H. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
US, No. 2007-1220 19 C.F.R. section 181.53, a deferred duty regulation, does not violate the Export Clause, or Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
Religious freedom in the EU: a US perspective The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has released an Issue Update: Religious Freedom Concerns in The European Union. [read post]