Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 4121 - 4140
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2015, 7:59 am
” (citation omitted)); Turner I, 512 U.S. at 675 (O'Connor, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (“Selecting which speech to retransmit is, as we know from the example of publishing houses, movie theaters, bookstores, and Reader's Digest, no less communication than is creating the speech in the first place. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:08 pm
Some universities don't do that. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:33 am
But you don't simply take it and hand it over to the police department. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:48 pm
Attorney's Fees and Sanctions In Discovery Motions in California Family Law Proceedings: What Lawyers and Judges Don't Seem to Know There is an all too common misconception by inexperienced family law attorneys, and certain bench officers - particularly those who have never been engaged in a civil practice or even a family law private practice - that equitable family law considerations of need and ability to pay are relevant to… [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:07 pm
The TV Cameras follow two Judges who don't like each for weeks as they train and spar and get ready for a fight. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:57 am
Sure, you may be guilty and there may be a time to confess, but don't do so at the station to the officer who says he just wants to "get your side" so it can be included in his report to the prosecutor. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:41 am
The victim, screaming, “Don’t let me die! [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
Also, the plaintiffs don't have standing. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:31 am
Then isn't the real question the treatment of precedent, if we're interested in predictability? [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm
It concluded plaintiff wasn't a public official and thus didn't have to prove "actual malice": Here, Plaintiff worked as a contractor at ICDC. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:25 pm
They don't deserve this. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 11:52 am
The Liptakian perspective holds that juries set punitive damages irrationally -- more particularly, that they don't weigh costs and benefits of a defendant's behavior in determining an economically efficient level of punishment and deterrence. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
Why don't the many five-to-four decisions prove that this is a "well-balanced" Court? [read post]
9 May 2010, 12:17 pm
’”And can we distinguish Austin? [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 7:24 am
(Nine Defenders join the amicus, and this isn't an "issue of exceptional importance" worthy of an en banc call?) [read post]
8 May 2007, 6:25 am
While Steven Korson may not have come forth with sufficient proof to justify relief in his favor, we don't understand why his case wasn't dismissed. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:42 am
I might explain the distinction in a somewhat different way, that we, lawyers, judges and even the occasional lawprof, argue at great length, and with enormous vigor, the rules by which trials happen in order to obtain half a chance for a defendant to fairly defend himself. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am
Technically he isn't eligible: his presidential records won't be subject to FOIA until he's been out of office for five years (releasing classified records could take years, or decades, if ever). [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 10:56 pm
Free markets don't remain free when governed by dictators, scalawags or oligarchs, and there is no more dictatorial figure in American public life than a zealous prosecutor or a courtroom judge. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:21 pm
(In fact, our own industrious, inventive judges don't require any high technology --they regularly stage elaborate, fully-costumed re-enactments of key portions of depositions as well as have documents delivered to chambers via a contraption made entirely from bamboo and coconuts).Also, smart to stay away from basic cable or satellite -- Uverse is the wave of future.Here's the best part about our letter-writing, new courthouse-defending… [read post]
