Search for: "*u.s. v. Kennedy"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 4,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
May 1982. v. 45 (7). [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:10 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:34 pm
The state asked the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 11:55 pm
Visit U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 2:01 am
There, the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 227 n.8 (1980) (quoting Judge Learned Hand’s statement in Gratz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
(Hat tips: Clark Lindsey.)Speaking of COTS, this blog is not Space War Probe: But the third quarter issue of MilsatMagazine focuses on COTS business.Newspace and the "Netscape moment": Leonard David overviews things (Space News).V-Prize visions: Zip over to lawyer and great guy Jack Kennedy's Spaceports, for v-cool news on the V-Prize challenge. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), a lot of commentators had written generic preemption off – but not us, as we pointed out here almost a month before Mensing was decided. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am
In 1988 Anthony Kennedy refused to answer questions about capital punishment. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:27 pm
Waxman (a former U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 4:44 pm
Justice Kennedy is still trying to keep up the pretense.) [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 11:21 am
Bush v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm
Thomas [U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 9:04 pm
Consider Sackett v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:17 pm
” Thus, turning to the “effects” determination, the Court analyzed the Act under the seven factors articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Kennedy v. [read post]
