Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS "
Results 4141 - 4160
of 95,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2018, 12:16 pm
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:52 am
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 10:01 am
"[Plaintiff] opines that '[g]iven the [Electronic Case Filing] system, local counsel is all but an anachronism,' 'nice for meetings and the like, but . . . otherwise unnecessary.' [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 5:29 am
For some of the documents, the deponent testified regarding the contents of the documents and even read portions of the documents into the record--all without objection as to privilege or work product. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:01 pm
Jones granted in part and denied in part the defendant’s motion to compel, ruling that the plaintiff had not shown that a consultant to the plaintiff met the criterion of being considered a “functional employee” for which all communications with the plaintiff could be considered privileged, but denying the defendant’s request for preclusion sanctions,...Read the whole entry... [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 4:05 am
In a 68-page opinion, the court dismissed all of them-- some on standing or mootness grounds, others on substantive or qualified immunity grounds. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 6:51 am
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
In rejecting the Title VII claim, the court concluded that plaintiffs had shown no adverse employment action against them because they had all received religious exemptions. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 6:43 am
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
Court of Chancery, Mar. 6, 2017), Vice Chancellor Slights ruled for the plaintiff in the case and concluding that the defendant “has engaged in blatant violations of court orders and bad faith litigation conduct that justify serious sanctions”, ordering him to pay two-thirds of the plaintiff’s counsel’s fees and expenses and all of the plaintiff’s computer forensic expert’s fees and expenses. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
The Court of Appeal reversed, holding that a nearest-tenth rounding policy is lawful if it is fair and neutral on its face and "it is used in such a manner that it will not result, over a period of time, in failure to compensate the employees properly for all the time they have actually worked," and that either the plaintiff failed to show that she was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, or the employer raised a triable issue of fact. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:20 pm
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 12:53 pm
Pa.) -- holding that FBI was precluded from using Glomar response concerning plaintiff's co-defendant because Securities and Exchange Commission had officially acknowledged existence of investigation and FBI's participation in that investigation.Summaries of all opinions issued since April 2015 available here. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 12:58 pm
Plaintiff won the first two times. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
"Summaries of all opinions issued since April 2015 available here. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 12:30 am
Unlike every other jurisdiction in the world except Switzerland, all eleven U.S. medical aid in dying laws require the patient to self-administer the lethal medications. [read post]
16 May 2022, 5:00 am
The court noted that the evidence in the record made the issue of the Plaintiff’s claimed residency questionable but not free from all doubt. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 1:54 pm
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 10:00 pm
Ellis granted the plaintiff’s motion for spoliation sanctions against the defendant, ordering the defendant to bear the cost of obtaining all the relevant data in question from a third party as well as paying for plaintiff attorney fees in filing the motion. [read post]
