Search for: "BAKER v. BAKER"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 4,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
Canada In the case of Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183 v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Thermo-Ply (PATracer) Honeywell – Patentee appeals finding of patent invalidity under on-sale bar provisions of § 102(b): Honeywell v Nikon (PATracer) Nalco – Nalco appeals from grant of preliminary injunction against it from infringement patent directed to method of removing or transferring metals and/or amines from crude oil: Baker Hughes v Nalco (PATracer) Nutriset - Access to food now an IP issue? [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
On 15 July 2022 there was a hearing in the case of LCG v OVD and Ors. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
IPSO has handed down a number of recent rulings: Resolution Statement 0782-18 Wilson v thesun.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 07827-18 Wilson v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation 06605-18 McPartlin and Corbett v Woman, 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 06604-18 McPartlin and Corbett v Now, 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after… [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
On the issue of the political question doctrine, the Fifth Circuit applied the standard test articulated in Baker v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:17 am
In Mazer v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am
The Court of Appeal has taken a different view to that of Mr Justice Baker in the Court of Protection, and decided that Article 5 of the ECHR was not engaged in P’s case. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
BAKER, C.J. dissents with opinion: [which begins] Although I very much agree in principle with the result reached by the majority, I believe that we are compelled by Willis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Baker Botts, L.L.P. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
On 24 April 2012 Tugendhat J handed down judgment in the appeal in Hallam Estates Ltd & Anor v Baker [2012] EWHC 1046 (QB) (heard on 18 April 2012). [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
BAKER, C.J., dissents with separate opinion. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Anne Klimowicz, a 5-page, 2-1 an opinion on rehearing, Chief Judge Baker writes:We grant the petition for rehearing filed by appellant-defendant Mari O. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am
Earlier this year, using as a springboard the Maryland intermediate appellate court’s decision in Eastland Food Corp. v Mekhaya, I posted about a topic on which there’s little or no New York law, viz., whether a complaint for minority shareholder oppression stated a valid claim centered on allegations that the directors/majority shareholders, instead of declaring profit distributions for all shareholders, were taking disguised distributions in the form of excessive compensation… [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
alp v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Title: PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
Chad Reynolds, a 27-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-defendant Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
In the case of Lascaris v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
