Search for: "BOX v. STATE"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 5,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
So has the government checked all of these boxes, to the judge’s satisfaction? [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 1:32 pm
Hian v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 10:28 am
Troubleshooter Network, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:17 am
Aero Rubber Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:02 am
Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are cumulative.Reputation of… [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:53 am
In Lupyan v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:02 am
Harris v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
It depends on jurisdiction (heeding presumption state or not), on the facts (drug withdrawn or still on the market), on the doctor (assess confidence, experience). [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Chief Justice Strine dissented, excoriating Duke for its "business strategy … to run the company in a manner that purposely skirted, and in many ways consciously violated, important environmental laws" (City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
In Burke v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
Breyer This remark was expounded at the Supreme Court earlier this month during a hearing in relation to Star Athletica L.L.C v Varsity Brands, Inc., et al.. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:42 am
” The plaintiff in Hutson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Circuit’s decision in McKeever v. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 9:37 am
” They portray Trump in a bumper car, as it were, bouncing off a black box called the Constitution. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 1:22 pm
This view was seconded to some extent by 1977 IPRS v/s EIMPAA SC judgment. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:55 am
He found support in the ECJ case Nintendo v. [read post]
