Search for: "Brown v. Justice" Results 4141 - 4160 of 5,257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:52 am by Renee Newman Knake
"  Professors Ben Barton and Darryl Brown filed an amicus brief arguing no, that pro se reforms are the better alternative for ensuring justice in these types of cases. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:14 am by Russ Bensing
  For that he was charged and convicted of obstructing justice. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
Justice Belobaba applied the test for assumed jurisdiction as set out in Muscutt v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Brennan arrived after the Court’s landmark Brown v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
Both are rife with eloquent lines about the deep connection Brown forged between the quest for racial justice, on one hand, and a capacious vision of public education tied to equal citizenship and belonging, on the other. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 10:05 am by Ray Mullman
Arkansas Supreme Court issued a great opinion in the case of Stephen Toof Brown (in-house Farmers Insurance Company staff attorney) v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:04 am
(image credit) Most noted among the latter is Brown v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
This devolution jurisdiction was first exercised by the Privy Council to rule on allegations of Convention rights violations by the prosecution in both solemn procedure (Montgomery v HMA 2001 SC (PC) 1, 19 October 2000) and summary criminal procedure (Brown v Stott 2001 SC (PC) 43, 5 December 2000). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:50 pm by Gary A. Watt
Justice Brown has a way with words, doesn't she? [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:54 am by emagraken
  They agree that the decision whether to apply salt to Highway #4 was an operational decision and that the duty of Mainroad was to take reasonable care to prevent injury to users of the highway by icy conditions: Brown v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:04 pm
Elizabeth Holland, Suffolk University Law School in Boston, for "Holder v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
")Chuck Berry - "Brown Eyed Handsome Man" ("Arrested on charges of unemployment / He was sitting in the witness stand / The judge's wife called up the district attorney / Said you free that brown eyed man / You want your job you better free that brown eyed man. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba  v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Gibson, Matrix.
It will be for the seven Justices (Lords Phillips, Hope, Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown and Clarke, and Sir John Dyson SCJ) hearing the appeals in these two parallel cases finally to determine the relationship of the Upper Tribunal to the courts in England and in Scotland respectively and, thus, whether the English and Scottish stories shall share the same ending. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
  Desmond Browne QC representing Mark Lewis submitted that the allegations complained of were plainly defamatory and serious allegations and that Police as a public authority could not rely upon qualified privilege following recent authority (see Clift v Slough BC [2010] EWCA Civ 1484). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:21 am by Russ Bensing
  The late Chief Justice Moyer, who sided with the majority, has been replaced by the court’s lone Democrat, Yvette McGee Brown, and she gave no indication of supporting a retroactive application of the AWA. [read post]