Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 4,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm
Two years ago, when a splintered Supreme Court approved lethal injection as a means of execution in Baze v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:04 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce has called the proposed rule “blatantly unlawful” and an attack on “well-established state laws,” and has said it is prepared to go to court if the rule is adopted. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
First, under the plurality test enunciated in O’Connor v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 6:06 am
It remains unclear whether he will travel to Strasbourg for the Nov. 20 hearing in the Court’s Grand Chamber, to testify or otherwise be present, as the Court considers an appeal of its voting rights ruling last year in Kovačević v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
As a means of invading privacy, a photograph is particularly intrusive” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:40 pm
NEW TRIAL LISTING SYSTEM - MURPHY J1.I intend implementing a new trial listing system for matters within my docket.2.I am doing so having consulted with a number of members of the professionand other judges, including judges in other States.3.Despite the increasing complexity of matters being dealt with by this court,matters continue to settle at, or very close to, "the door of the court" or whichadjourn. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
In the middle are a small group of academic theorists who see value and resilience in the state but understand that the ideological pretensions of the Westphalian system have become unrealistic in a world now ordered through governance frameworks of a number of actors only some of which are states. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
"Preliminary" means that the ECJ answers the question, and then the national court resumes its proceedings and enters its judgment, as opposed to a traditional appeal from a final judgment.When I saw the question referred to the ECJ, I already noticed that it was very well written, and I wish the Dusseldorf Regional Court had done a similarly good job in that Nokia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am
The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
The order also indicates that the oral argument in Lucia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
The Council of Europe will bear the travel and subsistence expenses of one representative from each member State (two in the case of the state whose representative has been elected Chair). [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 4:21 pm
Vidal v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:54 am
Dardi, J. applied the principle in Glover v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
On 4 March 2020, the Court of Cassation (Labour Chamber) ruled on Uber drivers’ employment status. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 2:20 am
Öztürk v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
The case of H.F. and Others v France, launched some years ago by the grandmothers of two detained children and their mothers held in Kurdish SDF camps, was decided last week with consequential implications for France and other countries. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Glatt v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
At least, that is what the Court's Third Chamber suggests in last week's ruling in Case C-98/06, Freeport/Arnoldsson. [read post]
