Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 12,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 6:18 am
The CJEU is under a duty to exercise its powers in accordance with the general principles of EU law, including the principles of equal treatment and sound administration (Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM, C‑51/10 P). [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:25 am
Tier 2 Unaccredited Investor Limit – In a Tier 2 offering, an unaccredited investor can purchase no more than: (a) 10% of the greater of annual income or net worth (for natural persons); or (b) 10% of the greater of annual revenue or net assets at fiscal year end (for non-natural persons). [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd & Ors (NI), heard 1-2 May 2018. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:00 am
Nursing and other healthcare staffing companies. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:00 am
Nursing and other healthcare staffing companies. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 5:36 pm
The ALJ’s conclusion was that Bourbeau failed to meet parts A and B for all 5 of the workers, and failed to meet Part C for all except Parah. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 10:05 pm
When you start the app you are asked to provide an email address and create a password so that you have an account with Envoc, the Louisiana-based company that created the app. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:33 am
However, Conaway disclosed a number of outside business activities including that he operates his securities business through a d/b/a C&C Wealth Advisory Group. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
It might determine who controls the company. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 2:08 pm
" If you hold shares of company B and will end up holding shares of A as part of a backside transaction, you may have to file and observe the waiting period before acquiring these new shares.Consolidations and acquisition of shares in NewcoIn a Consolidation, when Corporation A and Corporation B combine under a Newco that will be its own ultimate parent entity, the shareholders of A and B may receive voting securities of Newco in exchange for their… [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 1:29 pm
In particular, the Court wrote that there is sufficient commonality of interest under part B of the test as the hiring entity is a delivery company and the work performed by the proposed class is as delivery drivers. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:51 am
What Remedies Are Provided by the CCPA: Under the CCPA, any consumer whose nonencrypted or nonredacted personal information, as defined under Section 1798.81.5(d)(1)(A), “is subject to an unauthorized access and exfiltration, theft, or disclosure as a result of the business’ violation of the duty to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature of the information to protect the personal information may institute” a private right of… [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:12 am
The CPC sections are: A: HUMAN NECESSITIES B: PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING C: CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY D: TEXTILES; PAPER E: FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS F: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING G: PHYSICS H: ELECTRICITY You can find out more information about the CPC at the Patent Classification homepage. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:14 am
The first intervener invoked the grounds for opposition pursuant to Article 100(a), (b) and (c) EPC. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:40 am
§ 5940(b)). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
B. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:58 am
As is generally known, acquisitions by Chinese investors face a number of obstacles: a) agreement on the business terms, b) approval by the Chinese government, and c) approval by the U.S. government. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:58 am
As is generally known, acquisitions by Chinese investors face a number of obstacles: a) agreement on the business terms, b) approval by the Chinese government, and c) approval by the U.S. government. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 12:32 am
Under Section 271(b), inducing someone else to infringe a patent constitutes patent infringement. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
Circuit issued its opinion ruling (1) that Lorenzo could not be held liable for a fraudulent misrepresentation under Rule 10b-5(b) because he did not “make” the statements at issue, but (2) nonetheless upholding, in a 2-1 vote, the Commission’s finding of liability under Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) against Lorenzo because the statements in Lorenzo’s emails were false or misleading and he possessed the requisite intent. [read post]
