Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 4,551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
Div. 2007) (”if a party agrees to support a child beyond that otherwise required, a court must favor the agreement, in the interests of the child”); Hallberg v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
Case C-281/02, Owusu v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
C., area. . . . [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
The General Municipal Law Section 207-a/c Case BookA Guide to Disability Leave for those involved inLaw Enforcement and Firefighting in New York State2009 Edition, 1098 pagesThe Section 207-a/c Case Book is an electronic handbook for administrators, union officials and attorneys involved with General Municipal Law Sections 207-a and 207-c benefits available to law enforcement personnel and firefighters suffering job related injuries. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
We have previously summarized the motions and responses filed in the Churchill v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
"As to the appropriate remedy, Judge Schlesinger granted El's petition and remanded the matter to DOE for a new determination "which applies the statutory presumption related to the Certificate of Relief from Disabilities and otherwise evaluates the relevant factors in accordance with the terms of this decision. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
Section 1447(d) then says that a remand order "is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
(d) the decision of the House of Lords in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] 2 AC 465 had attempted to deal with these two ECtHR cases and had concluded that the right of a public authority landlord to enforce a claim for possession would, in most cases, automatically be justified under Art. 8(2). [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:50 pm
The ruling in H.M. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
05/28/09 NY Times:"We think its risky and premature," said Jennifer C. [read post]
24 May 2009, 11:37 pm
C-03-1130-CW (N.D. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:19 pm
Neither this section nor any other section of this Act preempts or otherwise displaces claims and remedies available under State law, except as otherwise specifically provided in this Act. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:16 am
LEXIS 42542 (D. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
L v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:08 am
C. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
As First Amendment scholar C. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:38 pm
The first, while recognizing that courts have divided on how to treat predominance in single-issue (so-called "(c)(4)") classes, does not go on to label them "confused," as the current draft does. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:04 am
We do not represent or warrant that the information available on or through the Site will be correct, accurate, timely or otherwise reliable. [read post]
