Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 112,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2023, 6:32 am
If a defendant does not have the funds to hire an expert, it may be possible for a sex crimes attorney to obtain court funding for an expert if it is established that a defendant cannot afford one. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:54 am
(holding that defendants' tender of partial payment negated any claim that they had no intention of paying for equipment); Bank One, Tex., N.A. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Defendants sought dismissal of Plaintiff’s SCA claims. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 10:04 am
The state does not need to prove the crime beyond a reasonable doubt independent of the confession, but the state does need to have substantial evidence of the crime outside of the confession. [read post]
9 May 2008, 12:08 pm
The Ninth Circuit in USA v Mendoza (May 8, 2009) reversed the conviction of the defendant, convicted of tax evasion, for violation of the defendant's right to a speedy trial. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:39 pm
However, that does not mean that the defendant has no chance of having the case against him reduced or dismissed. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:27 am
’s complaint does not allege that CCDH knew at the time of contracting, or should have known at the time of contracting, that breach of the ToS’s scraping provision would result in damages of “at least tens of millions of dollars. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 6:26 am
I will leave it to the Court of Appeals to frame the issue in this case: "This case asks us to resolve a vexed and recurring question: what does it mean to be Hispanic? [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
“Though the Episode’s allegedly false narrative portraying Plaintiff as ‘stealing’ the romper may be unethical or violate some other law, that narrative does not sustain the Rogers explicitly misleading prong as to Plaintiff’s Lanham Act claims. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
” And the plain language of the Rule does not provide for discovery of “likely,” “antcipated,” [sic] or “potential” claims or defenses. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
That reality does not automatically preclude an outright acquittal or dismissal, but does inform why it is all the more important for me to prepare all my criminal defense cases with the three-pronged approach of preparing for trial, for possible settlement negotiations, and for possible sentencing. [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 7:01 am
The suit was against 14 as-yet-unnamed Indiana Defendants, John Does 1-14. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm
Two of the defendant's friends who were at the party described the defendant as intoxicated or “buzzed. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
The post Justice Department’s Google Adtech Antitrust Suit Does Not Add Up appeared first on Truth on the Market. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
.), a Court of Appeals ruled that when an insurance company issues a liability policy, agreeing to indemnify its insured against a third party claim for damages covered under the policy, and to defend the insured against any such claim, the insurer does not have a duty to defend the insured against a third party lawsuit seeking only injunctive relief but no compensatory damages. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
.), a Court of Appeals ruled that when an insurance company issues a liability policy, agreeing to indemnify its insured against a third party claim for damages covered under the policy, and to defend the insured against any such claim, the insurer does not have a duty to defend the insured against a third party lawsuit seeking only injunctive relief but no compensatory damages. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 11:31 am
” The court’s opinion does not explain what the initial arrest was for. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 6:38 pm
If one statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not, an acquittal under either statute does not exempt the defendant from prosecution under the other. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm
The question is, how does the fact of third-party possession change the legal framework? [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:41 pm
On May 11, 2016, President Obama signed the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”). [read post]
