Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100" Results 4141 - 4160 of 5,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2011, 1:03 am by Maria Roche
  The evidence is that there are generally fewer hearings where both parties are represented  [§96(b)] and hearings are less likely to overrun [§96(h)]. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Joe Wallin
(B) LIMITATION BASED ON AMOUNT OF TAX - In the case of a taxable year to which section 26(a)(2) does not apply, the credit allowed under subpart A for any taxable year (determined after application of paragraph (1)) by reason of subparagraph (A) shall not exceed the excess of -- (i) the sum of the regular tax liability (as defined in section 26(b)) plus the tax imposed by section 55, over (ii) the sum of the credits allowable under subpart A (other than this section) and section 27… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:21 pm by Kevin Pitts
This is basically 2 12 oz. beers assuming 100% absorption and no metabolism by the liver. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:55 pm by Shahram Miri
In response, here are some additional issues that arise in the special needs trust context. 1. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:32 am by Mike
The sine qua non +1 of man is his nut sack. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:32 am by Kara OBrien
Investment advisers may no longer use third parties to solicit government business except in compliance with the rule on September 13, 2011. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
After answering all of Carolyn's questions, he added a cup of STFU: Try doing all the stuff we do as parents and lawyers while also getting emails from Baghdad that 2 mortar attacks occurred within 100 yards of your spouse’s bedroom. ... this us vs. them shit does nothing but breed animosity, and nothing good ever comes from that... pulling the “Hey, Mr. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
Alas, our intrepid judge concludes on page 18 of his decision that Rooker-Feldman does in fact preclude him from looking further into the issues that underlie the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 9:09 am by Daniel Shaviro
If Katrina comes, the party is over but at least he doesn't have to pay on the policies (because he can't). [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:58 am by Mandelman
I think it’s fair to say that I’ve written more on the subject of lawyers and loan modifications than anyone else… I’m not bragging, in fact I wish it had never been necessary for me or anyone else to write about the topic in the first place. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:34 am
Does it benefit -- and it is burdened -- by other rights and duties of states? [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
However, subsequent reports in the 1940s show extended survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (>100 days), Salmonella typhi (3-10 months), and hemolytic Streptococcus (>160 days) in cheddar cheese (D'Amico 2008a).1950: FDA promulgates regulations (21 CFR Section 133) requiring that cheesemakers use pasteurized milk, or cure the cheese for no less than 60 days at a temperature greater than 35°F. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
Union of India & Others AIR 1987 SC 1086, this Court observed that Article 32 does not merely confer power on this Court to issue direction, order or writ for the enforcement of fundamental rights. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:15 pm by Alex Gasser
Respondents argued that the claim language was ambiguous and thus should be construed based on the only guidance provided in the patent, a range of 100º-500º C. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff does not claim he received this letter after June 13,2008. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This ground had not been raised by the Opponent in the notice of opposition, but had been introduced into the proceedings by the OD exercising its discretion under A 114(1). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:14 am by The Legal Blog
The learned Judges said that a just but unreasoned conclusion does not appear to be just to those who read the same. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Rule 37(c)(1) "gives teeth" to the written report requirement of Rule 26(a)(2)(B) by forbidding a party's use of improperly disclosed information at a trial, at a hearing, or on a motion, unless the party's failure to disclose is substantially justified or harmless. [read post]