Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 5,143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 7:21 am
Assistant DA's will be encouraged to come forward if they believe the wrong person is charged. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 6:08 pm
I think I'm going to stop writing about them. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:21 am
Here's the summary of the issues presented in the brief:1. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:33 pm
No. 1528 (S.C.), where the court held at para. 17 that lack of timeliness does not necessarily preclude an application to strike a jury notice. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 2:41 pm
She points out that the House is relying on self-interested car dealers, not the government, for the claim that the original $1 billion authorized under the program has been committed. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 11:13 am
Essentially, it rejects the use of a "net profit" approach because it does not take into account extrinsic market factors that may have contributed to an increase in the stock's value. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:45 pm
Id. col.4 ll.1-7, col.7 ll.30-39. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
Constitution's full faith and credit clause (article IV, section 1), and the full faith and credit statute (28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 1:44 pm
This new open meeting law takes effect in a year -- on July 1, 2010. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 10:33 am
He's spent 1/3 of his life in our custody. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:12 pm
After pointing out how Posner's op-ed badly mischaracterizes the CFPA proposal itself, Thaler makes his case for regulation based on actual human behavior rather than false ideals of perfect rationality: Posner does not stop at mischaracterizing the proposal. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:01 pm
I tell them the same thing I'll tell you. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 5:24 pm
If the panel does not agree with a certain interpretation of a provision, what is the point of using three of four pages of arguments to refute arguments based on an interpretation you don't agree with? [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
When considering a redevelopment authority's condemnation of what is assumed by all litigants to be a valuable leasehold interest, how does a court determine the lessee is owed nothing, and conclude that nothing is "just" compensation (and indeed, the lessee must pay back the compensation it was previously paid, plus interest)? [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:53 am
Here are some things to look for-- What does the CV say about the expert's areas of expertise? [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 8:23 am
First, the law does not assure racial justice, but it can help bring it about. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:27 am
How does a law firm deal with negative references in Google search results? [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 12:32 am
The specific grounds:(1) The studies Dr. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:15 pm
That's simple. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:49 am
(You might want to check your O'Connor's on this point, because it contains a unseful analysis what a limine ruling does and doesn't do).A few of these issues came to mind this morning when I was reading Judge Folsom's order on defendant Sercel's motion in limine in this case. [read post]
