Search for: "General Products Corp" Results 4141 - 4160 of 6,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
" In granting the motion to dismiss, the Northern District of Ohio went through the litany of analysis of Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:20 pm
 One example shows the case of Fagan v Amerisourcebergen Corp. et al. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 7:58 am by Bright!Tax Writers
S-Corps S-Corps aren’t a business structure, but rather a tax classification. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 7:58 am by Bright!Tax Writers
S-Corps S-Corps aren’t a business structure, but rather a tax classification. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, Schering-Plough Corp – Following dispute over trade dress with Schering-Plough, Fruit of the Earth announces plan to change its package design: (IP Law360), US: Quanta and its impact on biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), US: BIO files amicus brief asking CAFC to cabin in scope of KSR and hold that its obvious to try dicta does not abrogate the Deuel standard: In re Kubin: (Patently-O), US: StemCells gets patent on enriched central nervous system stem cell and… [read post]
For example, in General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., GAO determined that the use of a Fixed Price Level of Effort contract type was inappropriate where the work was clearly defined, including both staffing and performance requirements, and there was no level of effort agreed upon, rather the hours set forth for each period were either a ceiling or estimate. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:03 am by MBettman
Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986) (The use of frequency, regularity, and proximity as factors in determining whether exposure to particular products constituted a substantial factor was reasonable. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am by Bob Eisenbach
As explained by the Seventh Circuit in XMH: Often the owner of a trademark will find that the most efficient way to exploit it is to license the production of the trademarked good to another company, which may have lower costs of production or other advantages over the trademark’s owner. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am by Bob Eisenbach
As explained by the Seventh Circuit in XMH: Often the owner of a trademark will find that the most efficient way to exploit it is to license the production of the trademarked good to another company, which may have lower costs of production or other advantages over the trademark’s owner. [read post]