Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 4141 - 4160 of 6,574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2012, 10:49 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court (Hohnbaum), ___ Cal.4th ___ (Apr. 12, 2012). [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:04 pm by AALRR
  Just two months later, on October 22, 2008, the California Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's petition for review of the Court of Appeal's decision in Brinker. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:03 am by Lynberg & Watkins
KirbyMore than three long years ago, the California Supreme Court granted review in a key employment case with the potential to drastically affect nearly all California employers. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
Citing the 1803 landmark case of Marbury v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
  Accordingly, the Court remanded the action to the Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:42 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Judge Olszewski of the Pennsylvania Superior Court aptly summed up the problem in a dissent in Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
Superior Court:  Does a court commissioner, acting without the consent of the parties, have authority to summarily deny a petition for writ of habeas corpus or a petition for writ of mandate? [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 10:57 am by Doug Reiser
The Supreme Court will hear argument on I-1183 constitutionality on May 17   The Washington Supreme Court has agreed to take on review of the WASAVP v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
A Marion Superior Court has granted the State of Indiana summary judgment in a suit challenging the validity of the state’s private... [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:28 pm by AALRR
  Just two months later, on October 22, 2008, the California Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's petition for review of the Court of Appeal's decision in Brinker. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am by admin
  A few months after the adoption of Escondido’s rent control ordinance, they filed suit in San Diego County Superior Court. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The district court granted certification in part and denied it in part. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:22 pm by Dennis Crouch
The Court was aware of the need for caution and warns in its opinion: The Court has recognized, however, that too broad an interpretation of this exclusionary principle could eviscerate patent law. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm by David Kopel
The Court fulfilled this duty in cases such as Hylton v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
”5 While it’s true that the Copyright Act doesn’t explicitly refer to secondary liability in so many words, § 106’s grant of the exclusive right “to authorize” in fact indicates Congress’s e [read post]