Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 14,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2010, 4:37 am
” In Brooks v State of New York, NY2d, the Court of Claims considered a case involving alleged libel brought by an employee of one State agency against the State because of the allegedly disparaging statements made about him by the employee of another State agency. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:53 pm
Of course, some judges have pointed out the irrationality of accepting this argument, most notably Chief Judge Kaye (dissenting) on the NY Court of Appeals last summer in Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:04 pm
NOSTRAME v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 1:38 pm
For lots and lots of reasons, I really hope the Supreme Court takes this case. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
In the latest such ruling, Lin v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:49 pm
That said, one proposition that, I suspect, most who litigate, teach, or write in the area have long thought -- since Coker v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:39 am
In Byron Chapman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
[Correction: An earlier version of this post stated that Kennedy’s opinion in Murr v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
” Eight Circuit Holds that Class-Action Waiver in an Arbitration Agreement is Not Unconscionable – In Cicle v. [read post]
Court Benchslaps Trade Secret Plaintiff and Counsel For Bad Faith Litigation–RBC Bearings v. Caliber
18 Aug 2016, 7:41 am
The opinion isn’t in Westlaw but does appear in Lexis [RBC Bearings Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
" It is hoped that they won't takes that ball and go home without first approving appropriate judicial compensation. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 9:44 am
Plans Comm. of IBM v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:00 am
United States CellularJudge Dow1:07-cv-02883 Kids Hope USA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Yesterday the Court heard arguments in Armour v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
(Baumancites and quotation marks omitted).The only exception to Bauman’s state of incorporation/principal place of business rule is for “exceptional” situations similar to Perkins v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:18 pm
Bennett v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:14 am
Since OPPO's indefinite withdrawal from the German market became known earlier this month, I've been hoping for more information on the state of play between the smartphone maker and Nokia. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 10:24 am
But in Milliken v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:16 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
