Search for: "House of Congress Employment"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 5,072
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2010, 9:30 pm
If Congress wants to make this practice illegal, perhaps Congress should enact a law saying that no person who has filed papers to run in a federal election may be contacted by anyone in the Executive Branch about possible employment until the election is over. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm
Scott Ferrall: All right, my guest tonight – let's go ahead and get to that, because I've got some folks who have got a lot of questions and they want them answered, concerning the IRS, what you can do, and if you are I guess in the holding with the IRS, and you have done something that you have got to get handled. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
http://tinyurl.com/36khvkn Inside the Mind of In-house Counsel - http://tinyurl.com/3axdknj Internet Privacy Legislation Released In Congress - http://tinyurl.com/373q2no Judge Scheindlin Amends Recent Pension Opinion - http://tinyurl.com/2fjfx7u Legal Problems in Ontario? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:20 pm
There is no comparable provision in the House bill. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 12:12 pm
We’re beefing the Employment division. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:19 am
Candelaria, in which the government has argued that an Arizona law punishing the employers of unauthorized aliens is preempted by federal law. [read post]
31 May 2010, 4:09 am
The buyer then resold the house to a third person. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Session III (Licenses - Open and Closed) Jason Schultz spoke about creating a kind of GPL for patents (and then my computer crashed, so sad). [read post]
28 May 2010, 10:46 am
The Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act, introduced with bipartisan support earlier in the Congress by Sen. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:16 am
Sestak could not serve on the board while still serving in Congress.... [read post]
28 May 2010, 6:24 am
This would not be a big deal other than for the existence of a federal law barring the offer of employment for political purposes. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:46 am
On March 10, 2010, the House Education and Labor Committee held hearings on the bill, transcripts of which are available here. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:08 am
Of course the Obama House and members of Congress have already demonstrated over and over again they have no clue about competition. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:52 am
Is Congress hedging its bets? [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:55 pm
By attaching the bills to "must pass" legislation, such as an appropriations bill, we may soon see just how filibuster proof this Congress is when it comes to employment and labor matters.Update May 25, 2010: Labor Relations Today covers the same topic and closes with the following:On March 10, 2010, the House Education and Labor Committee held hearings on the bill, transcripts of which are available here. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:02 am
Congress gives us plenty of genuine ethics concerns to worry about – particularly the role of campaign contributions which are de facto “bribes” (watch carefully what happens to the banking reform bill when it goes to House-Senate conference). [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:31 pm
—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Commission may not be compelled to disclose any report or information contained therein required to be filed with the Commission under this subsection, except that nothing in this subsection authorizes the Commission— ‘‘(A) to withhold information from Congress, upon an agreement of confidentiality; or ‘‘(B) prevent the Commission from complying with— ‘‘(i) a request for information from… [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:14 pm
The new law requires employers that are servicing public contracts to verify the legal status of their workers. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:21 am
If a developer of apartment housing, who concededly has a non-delegable duty to comply with the ADA and FHA, can be indemnified under state law for its ADA and FHA violations, then the developer will not be accountable for discriminatory practices in building apartment housing. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:38 am
for an exemption that is consistent with the SEC‘s previous exemptive policy and that takes into account the range of organizational and employment structures employed by family offices. [read post]
