Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 4141 - 4160 of 9,822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2016, 11:46 am by Kerry Sheehan
The law as written is flexible enough that providers can design and implement policies that make sense for the nature of their service and their subscribers’ circumstances. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Practice tip: even if you and your trial judge are in agreement, if you’re wrong on the law you don’t get a pass if a new judge takes over or your case gets challenged on appeal. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Here’s an important lesson for practicing lawyers: even if you and your trial judge are in agreement, that doesn’t mean you get a pass if a new judge takes over or you’re case gets challenged on appeal. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am by Randy Barnett
Rejecting stare decisis when previous decisions conflict with the Constitution does not mean rejecting res judicata. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 2:17 am
 There have been various attempts to allow for costs outside this £50,000, most notably in Henderson v All Around the World [2013] EWPCC 19 (27 March 2013) re the ATE insurance premium (at that time recoverable from the other side) and OOO Abbott v Design & Display Limited [2014] EWHC 3234 (IPEC) (10 October 2014) re costs on the indemnity basis from the period after the Relevant Period for the Part 36 offer has expired at [21]. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:02 am by Florian Mueller
It's a communication about the referred site.Nor does such a link constitute a "making available [...] of" whatever may be on the other site (unless, which is not what we're talking about here, the other site is password-protected and you need to go through some other site to gain access). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am by Michael Risch
The court cites In re Zahn (an often maligned case) approvingly. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:59 am by JD Hull
Every detail of the building (too many to list here) is designed to conserve, sustain, and/or protect. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:49 am by Paul Adam
 But even before the Charter era, it was considered a civil offence to interfere with the married relations of another person (for instance, by offering a financial incentive to leave a spouse- see Re McBride, 1980, Ontario Superior Court) and the courts were prepared to strike out last wills that meddled in such a manner.The Priebe EstateIn February 2016, Justice A.K. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
In this article, we too argue that the madwomen lawyers in Laws of Attraction, Michael Clayton, and I am Sam can be re-read as women seeking themselves. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:43 am by Bill Otis
(Ironically, they lost in both venues by about the same margin, 55% or so to 45% or so).This was also the year that saw Gallup register nationwide support for the death penalty at 60% or more for the 42nd consecutive time.Because the false narratives peddled by the mainstream press (we're executing the innocent, etc.) have been a drumbeat at least since the turn of the century; because a raft of manufactured procedural delays and obstructionist judges have gummed up the works;… [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
As reported in the Gazette here  New Guidance for coroners on dealing with the media (designed to help coroners and reporters alike). [read post]