Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 4141 - 4160 of 30,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2021, 4:02 pm by Jonathan Pyzer
Although Person B does not have physical possession of the substance, both individuals are considered to be in possession of the substance/narcotic.Therefore, if an individual is charged with possession of a narcotic or substance, the Crown is required to prove the following elements of the offence in front of a judge or jury: That the accused had physical possession or custody of the prohibited substance;That the accused knew the prohibited substance was physically… [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
They’re using innovation in a very broad way. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am by Jon L. Gelman
This case provides a judicial finding that establishes a causal relationship and as an evidentiary model in presenting scientific evidence to achieve that result.Pilliod v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 2:58 pm by Josh Blackman
[Re-upping a post I wrote with Seth Barrett Tillman in March] Governor Cuomo has now resigned. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:51 am by Daniel
 Possession can be actual – you’re holding the drugs when the police see you. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Plano Molding Co., 696 F.3d 647, 655 (7th Cir. 2012); In re M/V  Rickners  Genoa  Litig., 622  F. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 11:40 am by Joe Mullin
This was especially true back in 2008, before patent examiners should have applied guidance from the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice v. [read post]