Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 4141 - 4160 of 12,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 5:50 am by SHG
Copyright © 2015 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:50 am by Wanda Gomez
Justice Ginsberg, joined by Justice Thomas, concurred in the judgment but wrote her own opinion to “flag a larger question” — advanced  exclusively by FACDL-Miami’s brief —  that the continued viability of the dual-sovereignty doctrine “bears fresh examination in an  appropriate case. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 5:47 pm
She said yes, and he asked: "We're you a moot court finalist? [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:55 am
Chief Justice Ron George wrote the opinion.... [read post]
20 May 2022, 8:52 pm by Andrew Hamm
Law firm asks justices to consider the scope of attorney-client privilege for dual-purpose documents In In re Grand Jury, the petitioner (whose identity is redacted in the petition) is a law firm asking the justices to clarify the scope of attorney-client privilege when a communication with a client involves legal and non-legal advice. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 10:39 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Our detailed summary of the underlying facts and lower court opinions in Ferris, Thompson is here. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 12:06 am
As Ed Burns put it, "When you're going up against mythology you're swatting smoke. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:30 am by Eugene Volokh
To be sure, some such decisions may be foolish or narrow-minded, but they're not unconstitutional. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(To be fair to Justice Alito, he dissented in Walker, but Justice Breyer wrote the majority opinion in Walker and also joined Justice Alito’s opinion in Tam.) [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:15 am by SHG
  The Supreme Court, being as kind as it could to me, provided an answer in its per curiam opinion in Mollenix v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  She is interested in practical information like whether it was produced in-house or done by a production company, costs associated with the production, flexibility associated with re-editing (i.e. for re-doing the intro for a new chief justice), samples of RFPs, etc. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Greg Mersol
  Tellingly, nowhere does the opinion cite the Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:08 am by Jon
Is liberty and justice for you and your children and grandchildren not worth more than that? [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:30 pm
“… the Dishonesty of the Third DCA’s opinion. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:17 am by WIMS
      In a strange separate, "concurrence" opinion, one Justice writes, "I write separately because the district court's errors were so many and of such significance that I cannot share the majority's confidence that they did not contribute to that result. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
I agree with Justice Huffman that the elements of robbery are met in such a setting, in my view because (1) the victim was in fact in fear (a subjective test), and (2) the circumstances surrounding the taking are such that a reasonable person might in fact harbor such fear as a result -- an objective test.But today's opinion seems to entirely eliminate this second prong, and instead hold that all that matters is the victim's state of subjective fear. [read post]