Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 4141 - 4160
of 62,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
Tracy Spevak and Gary Spevak v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
On an issue that's spit the district courts in the Ninth Circuit, it holds that you're allowed to serve the defendants through their registered agent in the Trademark Office rather than going through the (total pain in the butt) Hague Convention.By contrast, if you're not one of those people, you might be at least marginally interested in footnote five of the opinion. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:22 am
Case citation: Waters v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 8:05 am
In SEC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:09 am
State and Craven v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:11 pm
In Luv n’ care, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:44 am
In Maverick v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:59 pm
Even though it often appears like cases are re-litigated at the Appeals Court, it is actually very difficult (or at least should be) to overturn a lower court's factual determinations. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
I still haven’t blogged last year’s In re Social Media Addiction rulings from the California federal and state courts. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
In Trew v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:25 am
” “Parents’ Lawsuit Against Apple for In-App Purchases by Minor Children Moves Forward — In re Apple In-App Purchase Litigation. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
See In re Wells Fargo Home Mortg. [read post]
2 May 2015, 5:00 pm
Additional Resources: Morris v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
Additional Resources: Miller v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 10:50 am
Related Cases: Oracle v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 2:24 pm
” (Quelimane Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:31 pm
On May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm
If you were surprised at the potential effects of Concepcion v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
The problem with defendant is that he got a below guideline sentence, and so the 9th found no breach and no prejudice.In re Copley Press, Inc., ex rel US v. [read post]
