Search for: "In re Reader"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 29,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
” As near as I can understand, the Court found that because the veteran could have received benefits if he re-applied sooner, he was only barred from receipt of those benefits by reason of the timing of his re-application, not by a VA regulation (even though the regulation controls the relationship of the entitlement to benefits and the timing of the re-application for benefits.) [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
” As near as I can understand, the Court found that because the veteran could have received benefits if he re-applied sooner, he was only barred from receipt of those benefits by reason of the timing of his re-application, not by a VA regulation (even though the regulation controls the relationship of the entitlement to benefits and the timing of the re-application for benefits.) [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
” As near as I can understand, the Court found that because the veteran could have received benefits if he re-applied sooner, he was only barred from receipt of those benefits by reason of the timing of his re-application, not by a VA regulation (even though the regulation controls the relationship of the entitlement to benefits and the timing of the re-application for benefits.) [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 9:21 am
As a re-introduction, I am an administrative judge and writer of legal scholarship. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 4:00 pm
My grandfather had around 40-50 copies of the Reader’s Digest from the 1940s and 1950s. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:03 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2019)The Coalition for Peace and Ethics BHR Treaty Project is considering Draft of the "Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human Rights Law, The Activities Corporations and Other Business Enterprises," released on 16 July 2019 by the open-ended intergovernmental working group (OEIGWG) Chairmanship. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 9:40 am
If you’re a fan of the couple who made the video, if you’re one of the many who requested it, you watch it because it’s your thing. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:45 am
Now though with anti-China sentiment having become bi-partisan, we have to wonder whether resolving the trade war might actually hurt Trump’s . re-election chances. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:36 am
There are, however, some reasons that make this little book worth a re-examination. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:08 am
There's homosexuality in every Playboy reader. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am
(Any readers in the tech industry should be familiar with the problem of “patent trolls”.) [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2019 2nd Quarter cumulative CEQA update. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
Here's a course with an IPKat readers discount.Never Too Late 225[Week ending 9 Jun]Digging Designs - a six month review (& farewell) | Will Marvel Studios face copyright infringement claim for using Ghanaian kente designs in the Black Panther movie? [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 7:23 am
Or criminally prosecuted, because we’re way beyond Mrs. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 5:35 am
” One of those readers was kind enough to take a stab at translating the contract into English (thanks, Zach). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 5:31 am
We, the readers, are told that we shouldn't be so judgmental! [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 5:31 am
We're all still on a learning curve on paperless working - even those who were early adopters. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 12:20 pm
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
