Search for: "J. H.1"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 4,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2022, 6:10 am
Following the announcement, a delegation of American politicians including Eric J. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm
Sin embargo, el propio estatuto provee un contrapeso a esta alternativa en que el inmunizado se rehúse a declarar por continuar invocando la protección constitucional: Cuando el testigo insista en no declarar, contestar o presentar la evidencia requerida, a pesar de lo dispuesto en el inciso (1) de esta sección, la cámara correspondiente, o ambas cámaras en el caso de una sesión o comisión o subcomisión conjunta de ambos cuerpos,… [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am
Notably, this is considerably higher than the offense level of 18 for reckless homicide (§ 2A1.4(a)(1)(A)). [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:48 am
”Definition of “family violence”The current definition of “family violence” in section 4(1) is to be repealed. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm
Em discussão: saber se há ofensa à coisa julgada por ter a incorporação sido reconhecida por decisão transitada em julgado. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 9:40 am
Já existem cerca de 350 varas onde a tramitação dos autos ocorre apenas em formato digital. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Abbott, Glen Hansen and Katherine J. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
(See Foxgate, supra, 26 Cal.4th 1, 17; Wimsatt v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
" [1] One would think that the legal industry would have made giant strides towards remedying such primitive opinions. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:10 pm
@mocersa Si 1+1 es 3, es porque hay buen interés. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
En Banc ¶1 MADSEN, J. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
”[5] The authors of the epidemiology chapter acknowledge, in a footnote, “that [h]earsay concerns may limit the independent admissibility of the study, but the study could be relied on by an expert in forming an opinion and may be admissible pursuant to Fed. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
The Court made it clear that the majority agreed with the Judicial Commission’s dismissal of a complaint arising out of the same facts: “As to Donohoo’s claim that Justice Butler acted improperly in attending the fund raiser, the Judicial Commission noted that ‘[j]udges and candidates for judicial office can announce their views on political and legal issues as long as they are not pledges or promises to decide cases in a certain way. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:15 am
On the face of it, according to the black letter law (and leaving aside petitions for review for the present purpose), an Enlarged Board of Appeal decision only binds a referring Board of Appeal, according to Article 112(3) EPC:The decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall be binding on the Board of Appeal in respect of the appeal in question.However, Article 21 of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal give a different story:Should a Board… [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:34 am
To that end our conversation will likely flow around and through the following: 1--the social self as the reflection of the mother2--the social self as a reflection of the family3--social self as a reflection/result of one's ancestors 4--the social self as a reflection of God5-the social self as a refection of the state 6--the social self as terrorist 7--the social self as orthodoxThis conversation, like many of its kind, will develop naturally, in fits and starts. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
Law Judge John H. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
(Domestic Relations Law § 76–f [2][a]-[h] ). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:55 pm
The first cut of the daft of Chapter 1 may be accessed here: Backer_UNGP_Chp_1 . [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
(Domestic Relations Law § 76–f [2][a]-[h] ). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Rapid Transit Dist. (1970) 2 Cal.3d 1, 6 (Helfend)), ensures that plaintiff here may recover in damages the amounts her insurer paid for her medical care. [read post]
