Search for: "John Doe D" Results 4141 - 4160 of 9,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
TTAB Posts September 2008 Hearing ScheduleHeavner and Luepke Review "The Top Fifteen Mistakes of Foreign Applicants"New Legislation Aims to Cure Possible Defect in Appointment of Some TTAB JudgesTTAB Posts August 2008 Hearing ScheduleTenth Circuit Applies MedImmune in Trademark Declaratory Judgment ActionTTAB Posts July 2008 Hearing ScheduleText and Photographs Copyright John L. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" Does a member of the Animal Legal Defense Fund have standing to sue the Department of Ag and challenge its approval of this feathered propaganda? [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The preferred wording will provide that the exclusion does not apply until there is (1) an adjudication in the underlying proceeding (2) that is final, and (3) that is non-appealable. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:33 am
Attorney Matt Orwig, now working patent cases for the Sonnenschein firm, characterized In re VW II (correctly in my mind, obviously) as an activist opinion, and it's pretty clear that if it stands it can be a pretty major change in the law (depending what parts are dicta and a lot of other things, but's let's assume for purposes of argument that it is) as reporter John Council posits. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:15 pm by John Mikhail
”   In a July 20, 1781 letter to the President of Congress (Thomas McKean), Morris remarked that “it is evidently necessary and proper that judicious regulations shou’d be adopted in the distribution of Rations on this occasion. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
But does the company have an obligation to make a disclosure to the investing public if its CEO or other key official contracts the disease? [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:14 am by Shahram Miri
In contrast, a gift made by Katherine Moore in her will to "Carrie D. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:42 pm
Of course, in his defense, the Article 15.22 part of the opinion does seem like an afterthought.]Stephen Ruffin v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am by admin
It is a new word and an ugly word, and perhaps it does not mean anything very much. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
Albeit on other grounds, the court likewise dismissed the plaintiffs’ claim brought under Section 15(d), which prohibits companies from disseminating an individual’s biometric identifier or biometric information. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
Albeit on other grounds, the court likewise dismissed the plaintiffs’ claim brought under Section 15(d), which prohibits companies from disseminating an individual’s biometric identifier or biometric information. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
Albeit on other grounds, the court likewise dismissed the plaintiffs’ claim brought under Section 15(d), which prohibits companies from disseminating an individual’s biometric identifier or biometric information. [read post]