Search for: "John Doe T" Results 4141 - 4160 of 22,979
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by SHG
Maybe it doesn’t matter if you know who John Hanson was, but he’s more relevant to American history than Menelik, King of Axum, or Boudicca, ruler of Iceni. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am by SHG
[M]ore than 50 years ago, John W. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 2:53 am
What kind of wrangling does it take to get the CJ to give such a speech? [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm by Sandi Zellmer
Curiously, Chevron wasn’t mentioned, not even once, not even by the government’s lawyer (though it does appear in a footnote of the government’s brief). [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
Joe Manchin’s “approve one opioid, yank another from market” bill to tie FDA hands is a bad idea [Jeffrey Singer, Huffington Post] Death by a thousand clicks: what Boston doctors can’t stand about electronic medical records [John Levinson, Bruce Price and Vikas Saini, WBUR] Tags: FDA, Jim Hood, medical, medical malpractice, MICRA, pharmaceuticals Medical roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 8:48 am
(And, no, "technical" does not translate to "hungover. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:54 am by First Mondays
Is Justice Anthony Kennedy right in that justices shouldn’t use the internet to supplement the record? [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 10:01 am
  Does anyone else have a different opinion? [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 11:04 am
NACDL President John Wesley Hall says "I don't think there is a bigger waste of human potential and taxpayer money in the entire criminal justice system. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” At Balkinization, Richard Primus takes issue with Justice Neil Gorsuch’s “choice to use [John] Locke as a guide to the Framers’ ideas about the separation of powers” in Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:58 am
  As one commenter put it, the proposal -- even if is Alien & Sedition Acts-ish in its unconstitutionality -- does at least have the benefit of spicing up the law-and-religion conversation, which is, I suppose, always in danger of falling into the "what, another holiday display? [read post]