Search for: "Key v State"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 22,456
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 3:26 am
The key portion of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling states: “Owning a dog is, inherently, a public endeavor. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:38 pm
One key strategy to protect your business’ data is to characterize, and protect, that data as intellectual property. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm
In Rales v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:50 am
21, 2021, in the case of Santo’s Italian Café, LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
Another, indirect, pathway focuses on the support of key stakeholders to whom human rights related work has been given (by the state) or taken (in the absence of delegation). [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:14 pm
Department of the Interior (Allotments; Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html State of Alaska v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 2:50 pm
Conclusion For the second time this year, the Court of Appeal both has rejected a charter city’s interpretation of a key state housing law and has upheld the law’s constitutionality against a “home rule” challenge. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm
Heatherly v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 8:23 am
To satisfy the requirements for express consent under CASL, the sender must state the purpose (or purposes) for which the consent is being sought, include prescribed sender identification in the consent request and all of the following specific information set out in the Regulations (SOR/2012-36, section 4): (i) the name by which the person seeking consent carries on business, if different from their name (if not, the name of the person seeking consent); (ii) if the consent is sought on… [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 1:44 pm
The Supreme Court, in Tomlinson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
The law governs users who meet any of the following: resides in the state, does business in the state, or “shares or receives content on a social media platform in this state. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 9:33 am
United States in 1978, in which the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:04 am
Two days later, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will finally hold its postponed (due to Hurricane Ida) hearing in Continental v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The CUSMA state-to-state dispute settlement process, set out in chapter 31, includes important improvements with key changes to the panel selection process, transparency of panel hearings, and the rules of procedure.[10] Unlike the NAFTA procedure, each party must maintain a roster of ten panelists for disputes as they arise.[11] Necessary qualifications for panelists are set out in Article 31.8 and include international law and trade experience, objectivity, independence,… [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm
This background helps explain the widespread condemnation that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 7:53 pm
Key takeaways The Singapore High Court recently confirmed in Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General [2021] SGHC 202 (Mah Kiat Seng) that the common law doctrine of public interest immunity remains part of Singapore law and was not superseded by the enactment of the Evidence Act (Cap. 97) (EA) in 1893. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 10:54 am
United States, CAFC Case No. 2020-1924 (Fed. [read post]
