Search for: "Land v. People"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 4,713
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2009, 8:36 am
Disaster can create an urban palimpsest, wiping away everything but the land itself. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am
Missouri has the power to withhold state assistance, “but the means it uses to achieve its ends must be [, as the Court observed in McCulloch v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
Hopefully most of you aren't working, and thus have some time to remember those who died in faraway lands. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
These boards are established in the Districts of Jaffna, Kilinochchi, Trincomalee, Batticoloa and Anuradhapura in order to settle the disputes relating to ownership or possession of land. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
In Brown v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 11:36 am
From Teising v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:06 am
” He warned “non-whites on white lands” to leave, because “as long as the White man lives you will never be safe here. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 9:25 am
You can consider how the lower court in Williamson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Finally, there was the Google/YouTube v. [read post]
