Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, is significant because: (1) it involves a dispute over some fundamental but complex First Amendment doctrinal principles; (2) it conflicts with a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (3) (for reasons 1 and 2), it may very well end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 May 2008, 6:51 pm
Land Use & Envtl. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 2:18 pm
Chmielewski v City of St. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:43 am
Co-author Rusty Tucker In Hlavinka v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:18 am
Webb v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm
When I was about 14, I stood on the highest point in the continental United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:14 pm
” Afro-American Publ’g Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
United States, 16-7314. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
” Next the Court addressed the claim that the amendment was spot zoning, which the Court noted is defined as: “the process of singling out a small parcel of land for a use classification totally different from that of the surrounding area for the benefit of the owner of said property to the detriment of other owners…” The Court stated that a rezoning cannot be spot zoning, if it is consistent with the municipality’s comprehensive plan and held:… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
” Next the Court addressed the claim that the amendment was spot zoning, which the Court noted is defined as: “the process of singling out a small parcel of land for a use classification totally different from that of the surrounding area for the benefit of the owner of said property to the detriment of other owners…” The Court stated that a rezoning cannot be spot zoning, if it is consistent with the municipality’s comprehensive plan and held:… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
In addition, there is a strong chance that the Court next Term could be reexamining its controversial ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
" As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 7:20 pm
In Chattin v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 566 U.S. ___, No. 10-1062 (Mar. 12, 2012). [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Supp. 2d 360, 367 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (holding that “little past dealings” precludes a finding of acceptance through a course of conduct) with Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:25 am
” In other news… United States The PRC-U.S. war of words spilled well beyond Secretary Kerry’s Asia trip. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
The plaintiffs raised a number of objections to the program, but the winning one here was based on Article IX, § 6 of the North Carolina Constitution (emphasis added): The proceeds of all lands that have been or hereafter may be granted by the United States to this State, and not otherwise appropriated by this State or the United States; all moneys, stocks, bonds, and other property belonging to the State for purposes of… [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 11:54 am
A broad cross-ideological array of economists and land-use scholars have concluded that it is responsible for massive housing shortages in many parts of the United States, thereby cutting off millions of people – particularly the poor and minorities—from economic and social opportunities. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:06 pm
A broad cross-ideological array of economists and land-use scholars have concluded that it is responsible for massive housing shortages in many parts of the United States, thereby cutting off millions of people – particularly the poor and minorities – from economic and social opportunities. [read post]
