Search for: "London, Appeal of" Results 4141 - 4160 of 5,582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
We used to do a fortnightly post giving links and the abstracts to the articles published in the Social Science Research Network that are related to arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:17 pm by NL
Nzamy v Brent London Borough Council Court of Appeal, January 26, 2011 [Arden eflash 420. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:59 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
 But the parents have appealed (and thereby stayed) that ruling to the Superior Court. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm by Simon Gibbs
Many readers will be familiar with the case of Sousa v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2010] EW Misc 1 (EWCC). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On 24 January 2011 permission to appeal was granted in the case of Gaunt v OFCOM. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 1:38 pm
He was slated to get a substantial amount of money, but his ex-wife appealed that ruling. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:48 am by Steve Hall
The state has an ample supply of the drug because it acquired 90 doses from Britain before London imposed its ban, but when that cache expires, the whole legal nightmare might start over. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:50 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41 (28 January 2011) Hope and Glory Public House Ltd, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 31 (26 January 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Shah v General Pharmaceutical Council [2011] EWHC 73 (Admin) (28 January 2011) Jones v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 50 (Admin) (27 January 2011) Oadby Hilltop and Meadowcroft Conservation Area Association &… [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:29 am by Steve Hall
It was the first of these, sodium thiopental, that was thought to have passed its shelf life, and defence lawyers put this point in an unsuccessful late appeal. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:02 am by Steve Hall
Hammond with sodium thiopental ordered from an unlicensed British company that operates from the back of a London driving school. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am by Adam Wagner
Yemshaw (Appellant) v London Borough of Hounslow (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 3 – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that “domestic violence” in section 177(1) of the Housing Act 1996 includes physical violence, threatening or intimidating behaviour and any other form of abuse which, directly or indirectly, may give rise to the risk of harm. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:06 pm by Ilya Somin
City of New London, post-Kelo eminent domain reform, and recent judicial decisions on takings, especially the two big New York Court of Appeals decisions (the Atlantic Yards and Columbia cases).VC readers are more than welcome to come to either or both events! [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:13 am by David Canton
The IPC has appealed the decision . [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:55 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Miskovic & Anor v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Civ 16 (20 January 2011) Swain- Masonn & Ors v Mills & Reeve (a firm) [2011] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2011) Rohlig (UK) Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 18 (20 January 2011) Bellway Homes Ltd v Beazer Homes Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2011) Crema v Cenkos Securities Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 10 (20 January 2011) Nokia GmbH v IPCOM GmbH & Co KG [2011] EWCA… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm by NL
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm by NL
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:44 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
A London court previously granted the U.S. extradition request, but Tesler appealed the decision. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm by Maria Roche
TTM (By his Litigation Friend TM) v London Borough of Hackney, East London NHS Foundation Trust; Secretary of State for Health –  Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that the local authority, but not the detaining hospital, was liable to pay compensation to a person who had been unlawfully detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act  1983. [read post]