Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 4141 - 4160 of 36,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2022, 5:56 am by Ryan Goodman
The issue is whether the Court would accept such earmarked funds, and that is very problematic as a political matter for the Court. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Former Interior Secretary Didn’t Violate Lobbying Laws, Watchdog Finds MSN – Joshua Partlow (Washington Post) | Published: 5/19/2022 The Interior Department’s internal watchdog said it found no evidence that former Secretary David Bernhardt violated lobbying laws regarding a former client, a California water district that is the nation’s largest agricultural water supplier, although he continued to advise them on legislative matters on occasion after he… [read post]
26 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Ofer Eldar
Likewise, judges in cases involving corporate governance matters such as anti-takeover devices and fiduciary duties have cited those studies when assessing the consequences of different governance mechanisms for firm value. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:40 am by Distinctly
Class A drugs include: Crack cocaineCocaineEcstasy (MDMA)HeroinLSDMagic mushroomsMethadoneMethamphetamine (crystal meth)Dealing in Class B or C drugs can lead to a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison, an unlimited fine or both. [read post]
26 May 2022, 5:04 am by Rob Robinson
Read the original post. [1] https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/data-breach-response-guide-business. [2] https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/03/ftc-takes-action-against-cafepress-data-breach-cover. [3]https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/152_3054_c-4662_uber_technologies_revised_complaint.pdf.… [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Do feelings of well-being and security matter as outcomes? [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
In its decision, the PTAB issued a new ground for rejection against Claim 9 for lacking subject matter eligibility. [read post]
25 May 2022, 10:48 am by Holly Brezee
The Court noted that it would not enforce ipso facto clauses because they were made unenforceable as a matter of law by the passage of the Bankruptcy Code, particularly Sections 541(c) and 365(e)(1), because they are void as against public policy in favor of giving debtors a “fresh start”, because they violate the legislative history of the Bankruptcy Code which prohibits “against the enforcement of clauses that ‘hamper rehabilitation… [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
This opinion gives the Supreme Court another reason to intervene in the Texas case on the shadow docket; or if the Supreme Court defers the matter, the opinion sets up a likely circuit split that can support granting certiorari. [read post]