Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 4141 - 4160 of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will decide whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines, and Manrique v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
The reasons for this phenomenon are addressed below.First, examiners at the United States Patent and Trademark Office are given very little time to issue Actions on what are often very complex and detailed patent applications. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am by Raffaela Wakeman
More bad news from Afghanistan: Matthew Rosenberg and Thom Shanker document U.S. concerns that Afghanistan is not yet ready for the United States to withdraw its troops. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:20 am
 The timing of the suit also raises several questions because the UGG mark has been used for footwear in the United States since at least 1998 and UGG was named “brand of the year” by Footwear News in 2003, nearly a decade ago. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:39 am by Vandenack Weaver LLC
Move Press had registered this trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and its use of the mark clearly preceded the use by Peloton. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Under the TCPA, it is `unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States -- (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system . . . [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis    On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
Policing Counterfeiters: A Game of Whack-a-Mole Current anti-counterfeiting laws in the United States attach civil and criminal liability to manufacturers and distributors of counterfeit trademarks who use the mark in connection with the sale or distribution of goods or services. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Farley & Others (IP Whiteboard) Something to chew on: the Food Channel trade mark cases: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
Farley & Others (IP Whiteboard) Something to chew on: the Food Channel trade mark cases: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
  As a far as I know, the constitutionality of the ban on registering trademarks containing “the flag or coat of arms of the United States, or of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation,” 15 U.S.C. [read post]