Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 4141 - 4160
of 16,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 10:34 pm
It certainly does so, but for me that has never mattered much. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
The trade mark proprietor appealed on various grounds, including serious procedural irregularity: it appeared that parts of the Hearing Officer’s decision had clearly been cut and pasted from an earlier Decision, resulting in the insertion of incorrect dates of registration of various marks, of the inclusion of names of persons having nothing to do with the matter and with reference to the wrong section of the Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
Motion in limine decisions are usually a matter of checking off this or that from a long list. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:12 pm
However, because Baker wasn’t read into the classified program, he couldn’t actually discuss the matter with her. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 8:26 am
Anyone who saw Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s testimony before Congress in April witnessed first-hand what I experienced for six years as a congressional staffer: the Senate and the House of Representatives aren’t up to the task of understanding how technology is reshaping society. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 8:54 am
No matter who’s offended (and many would be), Facebook can’t be sued for “allowing” that user to speak his piece. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
Today marks Popehat’s second birthday. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:58 am
This started out to be a comment on Mark Bennett's latest (as I write this) post on "Justice" and "justice. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The website isn’t a clear infringement, but it also isn’t “steaming bulls–t” as a matter of law. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
Kennedy, a pivotal vote whose future on the bench is a matter of intense speculation. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:51 am
On to surveillance matters. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
IPKat Mark Schweizer: Want hard answers to tough questions? [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:44 am
Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655, 82 S.Ct. 993, 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962)) (internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:20 pm
"I'm hoping we don't go to that length in 2010," he says. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 6:24 pm
I noted how the certain obviously derisive trademarks, supposedly forbidden under 2(a), aren’t always. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 8:11 am
It isn't merely a matter of showing deference to those with the capacity to make your life miserable, but understanding that no matter how many times your mother told you that you, as a lawyer, stood at the top of the food chain, you don't. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:00 am
The Board was unmoved:[T]he fact that a term may have other meanings in different contexts is not controlling. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Time marks us. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 7:18 am
She couldn’t, and she didn’t. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
“In Edwards, personality didn’t rule. [read post]
