Search for: "People v. Day"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 23,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2009, 6:08 am
McCumons v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 3:03 am
Some ERISA plans have deadlines as short as 60 days after the last denial letter! [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm
In that case, Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:12 pm
Read the decision at: Evans v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
” (citing Lemel v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 12:10 am
Supreme Court case called Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:10 pm
v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:29 pm
DeJoy, and Carson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 12:01 pm
To our knowledge, it’s also something that has hardly ever been done before, because people generally don’t redact metadata in a load file. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:35 am
Today’s opinion resolved three cases that were argued together on the first day of the term: Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 5:11 am
Election day is tomorrow; the roundtable is still going on our sister website. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:46 am
The case was Abigaile Lebron v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
” Interestingly, the AD2 agreed and reduced the convictions from first to second degrees.Sometimes, it all boils down to a matter of degrees.To download a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 9:02 am
See Jones v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 11:11 am
In March 2012, he pled guilty in front of a jury selected the previous day and the day after that, the jury sentenced Mr. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
Judge Weill's opinion last week in Eaton v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
I've gone around saying Plessy was wrong the day it was decided," he said. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
So while the vast majority of people who qualify under the "in-state tuition for three years in a California high school" are already residents, and hence for whom the law doesn't matter, there are some people for whom it matters a lot. [read post]
