Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 6,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2012, 2:46 pm
Caldwell v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 3:35 am
That's the backdrop to the Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:00 pm
The Court of Appeal rejected the Attorney General's argument that your appeal should be dismissed because you're not allowed to appeal the sole issue of custody credits when you haven't raised the issue below. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 4:23 am
In Trauner, Ch. 7 Trustee v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:49 pm
As held in the case of People v Grinberg, chemical analysis is necessary for a prosecution under Vehicle and Traffic Law for driving while ability is impaired by drugs. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:26 am
Reich v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
But here, as the Court notes earlier, “The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:01 am
See Bullard v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:23 pm
Apple is the sole defendant in the lawsuit; neither AT&T Mobility, nor any related business units at the telecom was named a party. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
People need to heat their homes. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Nearly all laws classify people into groups, but the Constitution places restrictions on the ways in which these classifications may operate. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Nearly all laws classify people into groups, but the Constitution places restrictions on the ways in which these classifications may operate. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
There are people who may be making a profit from the sale of “medical” marijuana. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:34 pm
Hoggett v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:01 am
The injured worker in Krushauskas v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:27 am
The plaintiffs relied on a case, Romero v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:27 am
The plaintiffs relied on a case, Romero v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 1:32 pm
People don't do that. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
In addition, the evidence showed that Edwards engaged in a series of unusual and convoluted financial transactions, which served no legitimate business purpose and were intended solely to conceal and disguise the source, location, ownership, nature, and control of the proceeds involved in those transactions.In 2006, Edmundo P. [read post]
