Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 4141 - 4160 of 8,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Adam Dodek
The Alberta Court of Appeal’s review of the judgment of Judge Robin Camp in R v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
There’s some great Monday staples in here, from Lee Beck to Peter Mahker, but also a really interesting post from Sam Turco on whether or not credit counseling works. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
" At Indian Country Today, Peter d'Errico has an essay titled "The Dollar General Case: Anti-Indians Play Hardball, Indians Play Softball. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
Peter Preston argues that the hard cases of press self-regulation and royal charters are what matter now as the years since Leveson go by. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
New Year, New Rules For Employers Doing Business in California – Lisa Harris, Marlene Nicolas, Lindsay Holloman and Kevin Jackson of Sheppard Mullin on the firm’s Labor & Employment Law Blog FTC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 9:19 am by Andrew Hamm
On December 7, The Heritage Foundation will host a discussion on Fisher v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:31 pm
 Ben Challis, on the 1709 Blog, writes up a potentially depressing decision for US internet service providers on the possible scope of their liability in the BMG v Cox litigation. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:25 am by Joe May
Lobbying Arizona: “In Arizona, lobbyist disclose spending; you just don’t know on whom” by Justin Price in The Arizona Republic Canada: “Lobbying: important amendments to the Lobbyists’ Code of Conduct” by Gregory Kane, V. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:57 am
BSI Enterprises Ltd & Another v Blue Mountain Music Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1151, a Court of Appeal, England and Wales, ruling of 18 November 2015, is one of those decisions that looks as though it ought to be quite exciting because of its celebrity content but which actually has little or nothing to entertain the reader. [read post]