Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 4141 - 4160 of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2014, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
Those presidents and their State Departments believe that they must do everything they can not to tip off those in the region that the United States government is now siding with Israel’s claim to sovereignty over Jerusalem, instead of remaining neutral. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Even as long ago as 1980 we felt it proper to 599 "assume" that unlawful police behavior would "be dealt with appropriately" by the authorities, United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:57 pm by Josh Blackman
Those young immigrants do not have legal status in the United States under current statutory law. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 1:30 pm by John Floyd
The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Mark Walsh
In a December case, United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 9:30 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, sidewalks would be treated by the never-ending "waters of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:22 pm by Bill Otis
 Last I looked, the Sixth Circuit, for example, was saying that all its sister circuits had rejected it, United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:51 am by SHG
Scalia, naturally, dissented, because somebody has to take one for the team.Unfortunately, the jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court ends right about the Texas border, where the 5th Circuit has decided that Martinez may be fine for the United States, but has no place in the Republic of Texas. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court questions whether lawyers, of which the United States has no shortage, provide more social utility than scientists, engineers, and inventors. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by Charles Roth
United States (full disclosure — I was on the Chaidez team), the court found Padilla non-retroactive. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It is hard to see how.At least since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1943 ruling in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am by Adam Wahlberg
[Backgrounder: in a ruling issued April 28, 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled to uphold the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) fleeting expletive rule.[12] The court reversed a lower court ruling in the 2nd U.S. [read post]