Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 7,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:57 am
Penn State University, following many states and other institutions, closed in early March in an effort to slow the progress of the disease and to reduce the strain on medical facilities. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:05 am
Liu v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour; Paragraph 3 a) shall not be held to preclude, in countries where imprisonment with hard labour may be imposed as a punishment for a crime, the performance of hard labour in pursuance of a sentence to such punishment by a competent court; For the purpose of this paragraph the term "forced or compulsory labour" shall not include:Any work or service, not referred to in subparagraph b), normally required of a person who is under detention… [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
As found by the Federal Court in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:26 am
What those relevant factors might be is not stated [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
District Court for the District of Nevada issued an order [pdf] in the case of Righthaven v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 12:45 pm
This is the requirement of the Padilla v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 2:09 pm
Garnett (1922), the Court considered three different challenges to the 19th Amendment’s validity: that it was beyond the Article V amendment power because of its character; that some of the ratifying states could not legitimately have ratified it due to their state constitutional provisions against women’s suffrage; and that the ratification in several states had been procedurally irregular. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:56 pm
In favor of the Executioner State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 12:00 pm
Or, as the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 12:32 pm
In Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
This is the second decision in the past month, following Wilkins v United States, reversing a lower court holding that a particular statute is jurisdictional, ruling instead that the statute is merely a “precondition to relief. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
A holding of the latter, on the other hand, prompts a state-favored balancing test, in which the character and magnitude of First Amendment injuries are weighed against state regulatory interests. [read post]
22 May 2023, 10:41 am
A reflection of the character’s desire for lawlessness and chaos, as the line is spoken by a character plotting a rebellion. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Case C-235/09, DHL Express France SAS (formerly DHL International SA) v Chronopost SA, a case which the IPKat suspects will be greatly discussed, analysed, applied and indeed misapplied in years to come. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:25 pm
Neither Sherri nor Andre testified, although Sherri presented witnesses as to her character and to impugn LaDonna’s. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:39 am
The state of Florida requires all milk sold in the state to contain Vitamin A. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
